The Institute advances community-engaged scholars by supporting strategic visioning, quality scholarship, and effective practices in community-campus partnerships for teaching, research, creative activities, and service. We welcome collaborators!

Promotion and Tenure

The University of North Carolina at Greensboro has recognized community-engaged scholarship (CES) in promotion and tenure (P&T) since 2010 across university, college/school, and department policies as an aspect of teaching, research, creative activity, and service. Defining the core characteristics of CES in faculty reward policies and practices is essential to ensuring that high quality and ethical practices are codified and recognized. We share insights from UNCG’s journey to help scholars shape their policies, as well as their narratives for faculty review and reward.

Publications

Janke, E. & Quan, M. & Jenkins, I. & Saltmarsh, J., (2023) “We’re Talking About Process: The Primacy of Relationship and Epistemology in Defining Community-engaged Scholarship in Promotion and Tenure Policy”, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 29(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsl.2734

Janke, E. & Jenkins, I. & Quan, M. & Saltmarsh, J., (2023) Persistence and Proliferation: Integrating Community-Engaged Scholarship into 59 Departments, 7 Units, and 1 University Academic Promotion and Tenure Policies, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 29(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsl.2537

Janke, E., Jenkins, I., Quan, M., & Saltmarsh, J. (2022). Codebook for Incorporating Community-Engaged Scholarship into Promotion and Tenure Policy: An Institutional Case Study. Greensboro, NC: Institute for Community and Economic Engagement. (v.1). Codebook Available 

Incorporating Community Engagement in Faculty Reward Policies (Janke, E., Saltmarsh, J., Jenkins, I., & Quan, M). (March 2019). Eastern Region Campus Compact Conference, Providence, RI. (conference handout)

Experiences of Community-Engaged Faculty

As important as the question of recruitment, is the question of retainment. Once faculty elect to join an institution they perceive to be community-engaged, do their experiences once employed match their earlier views?  What are the factors that shape these perceptions of whether their views before and during employment align? What were their reasons for pursuing community-engaged scholarship at the university and which aspects of the institution do they point to when describing what attracted them? We explore this work to understand institutional alignment with the interests and values of faculty.

Collaboratory: Institutional Portraits of Engagement

Collaboratory was originally developed by the Institute for Community and Economic Engagement (ICEE) as a tool to help the University of North Carolina Greensboro (UNCG) achieve several purposes related to advancing excellence in community engagement.

Publications/Resources

LEAP: Health & Wellness Collaboration

Reports from LEAP communicate a “state of data” as it relates to healthy eating and physical activity in Guilford County. LEAP Reports share years-long processes of engaging all types of experts, including our Community Board, to provide a comprehensive view of the state of community-level data – and what we need to move forward. These reports share recommendations for targeting specific indicator areas, strategies for collecting and sharing data, and commitments to authentic engagement of communities to identify, collect and use data, particularly data that is about and intended for programs that affect them.

Restorative Practices

Conflict, tensions, and harm are natural and inherent in all relationships, even the best ones. It’s how relationships are built and nurtured that transforms difficult moments into productive opportunities for understanding and growth. Our scholarship supports skillful practices for building reciprocal and resilient partnerships.

Publications

ICEE’s Scholarship of Engagement

UNCG is known for its community-engaged scholarship. ICEE has been integral to our collective success through administrative and scholarly contributions. Here we share our learning through our publications.

  • Janke. E. M. (2019). Next-generation scholars and scholarly communications. In L. R. Sandmann and D. O. Jones (Eds). Building the Field of Higher Education: Foundational Ideas and Future Directions. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Janke. E. M. (2019). Lessons learned by a reflective scholar administrator: From Practice to Theory and Theory to Practice. In Hatcher, J., Bringle, R., & Hahn, T. Research on Service Learning: Practical Wisdom for Conducting Research (Vol. 4). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Janke, E. M. (2019). Scholar-administrators as change agents. Metropolitan Universities Journal 30(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.18060/23202

  • Hemphill, M. A., & Janke, E. M. (2023). Community-engaged scholarship methods and the ethics of qualitative research. In K. A. Richards, M. A. Hemphill, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), Qualitative research and evaluation in physical education and sport pedagogy (Ch. 7)Taylor & Francis. 
  • Hartlep, N., Lake, D., Purcell, J., Bush, A., Perry, L., Fleck, B., Kliewer, B., Janke, E., Markham, P., Orphan, C., & Saltmarsh, J. (2019). Toward an innovative civic engagement pedagogyeJournal of Public Affairs(8)1. (link)
  • Janke, E. M., (2018). Advocacy-based Research. In K. Wester and C. Watcher Morris (Eds.). Making Research Relevant: Applied Research Designs for the Mental Health Practitioner (Ch. 14). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 
  • Rodriguez, D. X., & Janke, E. (2016). Same words different ideas: Why educators and students need to make explicit implicit notions of civic engagement. Citizenship, Teaching, and Learning Journal 11(2),175–190. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/E_Janke_Same_Words_2016.pdf

  • Janke, E., Flores, S., & Edwards, K. (2022). Community-academic partnerships in the community engagement literature: A scoping review.  Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 26(2), 5-27. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/2630/2750
  • Janke, E, Flores, S, & Edwards, K. (2021). Dataset for “Community-academic partnerships in the community engagement literature: A scoping review”. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/E146781V2
  • Dostilio, L. D., Harrison, B., Brackmann, S. M., Kliewer, B. W., Edwards, K. E., & Clayton, P. H. (2012). Reciprocity: Saying what we mean and meaning what we say. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning19(1), 17-32.
  • Janke, E. M. (2013). Community participation is not a proxy for reciprocity. eJournal of Public Affairs, (2)2. Missouri State University.
  • Janke, E. M. (2009). Defining characteristics of partnership identity in faculty-community partnerships. In. B. Moely, S. Billig, & B. Holland (Eds.), Creating our identities in service-learning and community engagement (pp. 75-101). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Kniffin, L., Camo-Biogradlija, J., Price, M. F., Kohl, E., Williams, J., Del Conte Dickovick, A., Goodwin, A., Johnson, K. V., Clayton, P. H., & Bringle, R. G. (2020). Relationships and partnerships in community– campus engagement: Evolving inquiry and practice. International Journal of Research on ServiceLearning and Community Engagement, 8(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.18586
  • Janke, E. M. (2012). Organizational partnerships in service learning: Advancing theory-based research. In P. H. Clayton, R. G. Bringle, and J. A. Hatcher (Eds.) Research and Service Learning: Conceptual Frameworks and Assessment (Chapter 6.3). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Janke, E. M. (2009). Defining characteristics of partnership identity in faculty-community partnerships. In. B. Moely, S. Billig, & B. Holland (Eds.). Creating our identities in service-learning and community engagement. (pp. 75-101). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

  • Riemer, L., Schmitz, C., Janke, E., Askerov, A., Strahl, B., & Matyók, T.  (2015). Transforming Conflict. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Hemphill, M., Janke, E., Santos, F., & Gordon, B. (2021). Understanding issues of conflict and harm in the context of restorative school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education.https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0134
  • Hemphill, M., Janke, E., Gordon, B., & Farrar, H. (2018). Restorative youth sports: An applied model for resolving conflicts and building positive relationships. Journal of Youth Development (13)3, 76-96. DOI 10.5195/jyd.2018.60.
  • Hemphill, M. A., & Janke, E. M. (2023). Community-engaged scholarship methods and the ethics of qualitative research. In K. A. Richards, M. A. Hemphill, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), Qualitative research and evaluation in physical education and sport pedagogy (Ch. 7)Taylor & Francis. 

Share This